Friday, October 15, 2010

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

Hye peeps! Hope, all of you in a good condition today. Again, about nuclear. But, for this time, i will talk about nuclear fuel cycle. Sounds interesting right? So, let see what it's all about.

Nuclear Fuel Cycle 

Figure 1: Nuclear fuel cycle
Nuclear fuel cycle or nuclear chain cycle is a process to generate electricity. It consists of 3 stages.
  1. Front end fuel management.
  2. In core fuel management
  3. Back end fuel management
Front end fuel management is about preparation of the fuel, and in order to prepare it, those stages need to be done. First of all is mining and miling, following with conversion, enrichment, and fuel fabrication. And as a final result, electricity will be generated after steams from the water will turn the turbine in fuel fabrication process.

In core fuel management is about the fuel has been using in the reactor operation. While, for back end fuel management is about reprocessing or disposed spent nuclear fuel. The spent nuclear fuel that has been removed from the reactor will be hot and very radioactive, so it must be cooled and the solution is, stored it in the ponds at the reactor site. If the spent nuclear fuel is not reprocessed, we called it open fuel cycle, vice versa, closed fuel cycle.
Figure 2 : Cooling pond : In back end fuel management
Uranium
Definiton - A heavy silvery-white metallic element, radioactive and toxic, easily oxidized, and having 14 known isotopes of which U 238 is the most abundant in nature. The element occurs in several minerals, including uraninite and carnotite, from which it is extracted and processed for use in research, nuclear fuels, and nuclear weapons. Atomic number 92; atomic weight 238.03; melting point 1,132°C; boiling point 3,818°C; specific gravity 18.95; valence 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
reference from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/uranium

Uranium in nature consists primarily of two isotopes, U-238 and U-235. The numbers refer to the atomic mass number for each isotope, or the number of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus. Naturally occurring uranium consists of approximately 99.28% U-238 and 0.71% U-235

Uranium mined from the earth's crust and actually not usable for power generation. But, by several processes, uranium can be efficiently generate electricity.
Figure 3: Uranium mining 
source from wikipedia.org


Mining
Mining is a process to extract the uranium from the hard rock. In mining uranium, it comprised of 3 ways. You can choose either one.
  1. open cut mining (on the surface)
  2. underground (blasting hard rock and ore to create large openings in the ground)
  3. in situ leaching
In my opinion, the third way will be the best solution; in situ leaching because there are a lot of advantages if i'm using this way as my mining method compared with those two. Plus, after done with mining, we no need to proceed to miling process because uranium oxide already leached to form a uranium.The advantages of using in situ leaching are:
  • less expensive
  • less costly to build
  • no solid waste
  • less ground disturbance
  • less rehabilitation required
  • very little dust
Figure 4: In situ leaching process

    57 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    interesting article. could you explain more bout in situ leaching? like how it does not produce solid waste or why is there less ground disturbance?

    Lim Sze Yoong
    justinsylim@hotmail.com

    timb said...

    Interesting and informative article!! Ha.ha.now ve an idea how nuclear is process to generate electricty. The illustration posted is easy to understand.Heard about Uranium esp in movies and news but little idea wat its about so ur article clear my doubt. Do agree of your choice of mining which is in situ leaching,many advantages!! Wud like to know too why it does produce solid waste!

    Anonymous said...

    hi..interesting information..but i really dnt understand about the third ways of mining uranium which is situ leaching..can u explain more about that?tq.

    wan khairi hakimi bin wan abdul aziz
    ce083464
    wankhairi_90@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    hi...
    if the nuclear fuel fails to cool down and is high in radioactivity ...what would happen?

    DARSHAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM
    ME 083535
    darshan.bigd@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    will the power from the 3rd or 4th cycle have the same effectiveness as the the initial power..?
    will it be fully used if the cycle goin on for a period of time?


    sivabalan s/o sanafhei raja
    Me083646

    Power Nuclear said...

    @Lim Sze Yoong: In situ leaching does not produced solid waste because the waste is confined to evaporation ponds. While, there is less ground disturbance because of no open pits, shafts, tunnels, earth moving equipment or grinding and crushing facilities. Therefore, there is less visual impact. :)

    @timb: tq for your respond! do visit our blog again and get updated information about nuclear here!

    @hakimi: Oh, ok, here is some explanation about in situ leaching method. Where the orebody exists in a saturated sandstone aquifer, boreholes are drilled into it, and the surrounding water is treated with chemicals. This enables all the uranium to be dissolved and leached from the orebody, as the chemical solution circulates through it. The solution is then pumped back to the surface through different boreholes and the uranium is recovered. Hope, you are clear enough about in situ leaching hakimi..;)

    @darshan: if the nuclear fuel fails to cool down and is high in radioactivity, so it will begin to be overheated and nuclear meltdown will be occur if the reactor losses its coolant.

    @sivabalan: sorry siva.. i'm quite not understand with your question. Do you mind to precise it? thanks..;)

    timb said...

    Thx for prompt answer to my Q!!(left out the "not" produce solid waste will definitely visit ur blog 4 more updates on nuclear!!

    Anonymous said...

    is it possible to restore the surrounding water after treating with chemicals and do the chemicals harm the environment?

    YANG GUO XIAN
    ME083672
    iainygx@hotmail.com

    Ibn Batutah said...

    salam,
    urm... so mining uranium is just like mining for petroleum?
    isn't mining will cause earth unstablility? will it cause natural disaster? like earth movement?
    (MD NAZRIN BIN MD NAZIR,nazrinnazir.90@gmail.com)

    Anonymous said...

    Salam guys...hope both of u are graded well by ur respective lecturer.

    After analyzing all the info,comments n feedbacks...It suddenly struck to my head..What will we as tax payer have to pay to receive electric produced by NPP...which the material have to be mine n (some would say causes earth instability, which I do agree with him) n once u eat u have to pooh out---then comes how to dispose it...why do we have to take all the hustle n consequences to use nuclear when instead the sun glare that ALLAH gives to earth are MORE THAN SUFFICIENT enough to light up the entire life..even thomas edison said as below

    “I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that.” THOMAS EDISON

    Soo do we have to wait till uranium is out tooo

    mohamed nabeel b sidek
    me083582

    Unknown said...

    Uranium mined from the earth's crust and actually not usable for power generation. Does that mean that it was not radioactive originally?

    jivithan a/l kandeeban
    jiviremo@yahoo.com
    me083555

    Unknown said...

    hi, can i know where this uranium mining is located? if it can be extracted from the earth crust, then we should be able to get it in malaysia also rite?

    jivithan a/l kandeeban
    jiviremo@yahoo.com
    me083555

    Anonymous said...

    About mining Uranium, which one is more cheaper and affordable and also feasible for Malaysia...? Because I think ceratain aspects have to be considered when mining Uranium, the climate being included...?

    CE082377
    Abdulmajeed Almutairi Khatimo
    ma7ed100@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    salam...........
    wow,this post does really been helpful...
    this method surely will help the productivity and usage of nuclear power.....
    unfortunately,based on my information.so far,our country has no uranium mineral sources.....

    fasnor hesyam faisal
    me086029
    ronsaf17@yahoo.com

    timb said...

    This post is getting more interesting!! Many viewpoints!! I do agree with M.Nabeel!! Malaysia is a tropical country,we r blessed with sun=solar power all year round.Mega projects should be carried out to harvest this FREE energy and then supplement by Nuclear energy. Uranium in Malaysia? We have tin,gold,oil but uranium?Don't think we have them..

    Unknown said...

    in situ leaching process is the best way for mining, i want to know, how can this process less cost than other process.?

    alif ahnaf bin omar
    me084145
    alip04macro@gmail.com

    Unknown said...

    Hi there,i would like to ask a question. Is it really safe to do the mining when we have to face something that is highly radioactive like uranium? The job must be very risky for the workers that contribute in mining the uranium.

    Amiro Iqbal Bin Mohd Aminudin
    ME084618
    amiro_aminudin@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    salam..
    hi can i know about uranium price?because in Malaysia there is no uranium so we must buy with other country that have it.can you explain thoroughly in situ leaching process please?this is nice post by the way.keep it up

    Ahmad Aizat Bin Arifin
    artseni14@gmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    Very informative article. I believe that Malaysia does not have uranium, is it? So then if Malaysia is buying it from other countries, wouldnt it be costly?
    'But, by several processes, uranium can be efficiently generate electricity'
    What are the processes?

    DZUL FADHLI B MOHD HUSIN SERIA
    ME083538
    dzulfadhli@yahoo.com

    NeshVaR said...

    Hello Blogger,

    After reading trough ur post , i have a question for you...

    How does the uranium fuel cycle produce depleted uranium?

    and

    What role does depleted uranium play in the nuclear fuel cycle?

    Waiting for your answers..


    PAVANESVARAAN SUBRAMANIAM
    waraan_2@hotmail.com

    NeshVaR said...

    Hello Blogger,

    After reading trough ur post , i have a question for you...

    How does the uranium fuel cycle produce depleted uranium?

    and

    What role does depleted uranium play in the nuclear fuel cycle?

    Waiting for your answers..


    PAVANESVARAAN SUBRAMANIAM
    waraan_2@hotmail.com

    e_azizan said...

    hye..
    very interesting article.
    From the diagram of nuclear fuel cycle, after the uranium have been used up, it passed to waste disposal process. Could you explain how the process of uranium disposal take place?

    ENGKU AHMAD AZIZAN
    ME083540

    dozs said...

    hye..as i understand the spent nuclear fuel must be removed from the reactor..the fuel will be hot and radioactive so it needs to be cooled down first..how long does the cooling process takes and after the cooling,how do we content or keep the fuel safely for disposal?

    Unknown said...

    hallow febregas and other friends...

    from your opinion about mining process , you choose in situ leaching.i think underground process is better.what your explanation??

    khuzaimi bin kamaruddin
    acai_otai@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    I'm aware that we do not need that many uranium compared to coal or petroleum to power nuclear reactors, but i'm not that informed of the raw material itself (uranium).. is the material itself, exposed to the surroundings can harm the environment? and the act of mining it, is it hazardous to the mine workers and the surrounding cities?

    thanks in advance:)

    Muhamad Rifdy bin Samsudin
    CE083444
    ed_dy12@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    in situ leaching or ISL seemed to be the best way for mining uranium ore as the uranium oxide is leached to form a uranium (from the article).but there are still disadvantages such as the risk of leaching liquid excursions beyond the uranium deposit and subsequent contamintion of ground water , the unpredictable effects of the leaching liquid on the host rock of deposit and etc.

    EYU ZHI MING
    ME083541
    invader81@hotmail.com

    Fatin Norain said...

    As you mention above, in situ leaching will be the best solution.
    Does mining technique depends on the condition in which the ore is found?

    FATIN NORAIN BT AHMAD SABRI
    ME083981
    fna_90@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    In situ leaching is definitely the best way to extract the natural element in my opinion. What element specifically they use in a nuclear reactor? U235? And can you please explain in short how the process goes as uranium is extracted out and processed and then actually used in the reactor.


    Ang Jit Yong (ME083530)
    aplox3@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    OMG.. I didnt see the 1st part of the post. Sorry, i just read the process. Good post:) It's very good for students like us to start to know the basics of everything in this case nuclear.


    Ang Jit Yong (ME083530)
    aplox3@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    OMG.. I didnt see the 1st part of the post. Sorry, i just read the process. Good post:) It's very good for students like us to start to know the basics of everything in this case nuclear.


    Ang Jit Yong (ME083530)
    aplox3@hotmail.com

    Anonymous said...

    Good article.
    From this article we know that uranium is the main fuel to be use in nuclear technology.
    Eventhough it can be efficiently generate electricity,some safety precaution must be considered,because uranium exposure;

    1.can affect normal function of the kidney,brain,liver and other systems.

    2.is weakly radioactive,but it is a toxic metal.

    just sharing!! =]

    name: JAFFREEN BIN JAAFAR
    emel: jeff_kyo90@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    Great info,
    On this post,it just less reader friendly, feel interesting at the beginning, but feel little bit bored when reading the fact.

    Anonymous said...

    Great info,
    On this post,it just less reader friendly, feel interesting at the beginning, but feel little bit bored when reading the fact.

    Ahmad harmaini Azizul
    me083840
    ahmad.harmaini@gmail.com

    sapik said...

    " The spent nuclear fuel that has been removed from the reactor will be hot and very radioactive, so it must be cooled and the solution is, stored it in the ponds at the reactor site. "
    may i know how the cooling pond work and how big it is?
    thank you,

    Mohd Shafiq Bin Idris
    ME083587
    sapik_900906@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    from the advatages as stated in situ leaching,i think it should be the best solution for this.We need to consider the point or main purpose of working on nuclear power is to face the future problem of running out of fuel and nuclear power can generate electricity cheaper compared to another sources.

    FARID ASNAWI AHMAD
    ME081809
    nawi_fender@yahoo.com

    Kah Hoo said...

    It seems like the in-situ leaching method really is the best way to extract uranium. Could you please explain to us how this in-situ leaching method works? Since it doesn't require explosives to create open pathways for mining(which is a good thing), how do we get to reach the uranium in deep ground?

    NG KAH HOO
    nakahee_90@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    salam..
    nice article.. good jobs guys. i agree with u that in situ leaching is the best way to do the mining. In term of cost and maintanence, all is good. Howener, i wonder whether this in situ lwaching give any effect to our environment?
    cn u explain little bit. TQ. ^_^

    Hazim Bin Sharudin
    sena_90@yahoo.com.my

    Anonymous said...

    salam..
    nice article.. good jobs guys. i agree with u that in situ leaching is the best way to do the mining. In term of cost and maintanence, all is good. Howener, i wonder whether this in situ lwaching give any effect to our environment?
    cn u explain little bit. TQ. ^_^

    Hazim Bin Sharudin
    sena_90@yahoo.com.my

    Anonymous said...

    salam..
    nice article.. good jobs guys. i agree with u that in situ leaching is the best way to do the mining. In term of cost and maintanence, all is good. Howener, i wonder whether this in situ lwaching give any effect to our environment?
    cn u explain little bit. TQ. ^_^

    Hazim Bin Sharudin
    sena_90@yahoo.com.my

    Tevan said...

    in what ways does the insitu leeching contribute to lesser ground disturbance and how does the insitu leeching work?

    Tevan Nair
    ME3630
    dr.spiceinlife@yahoo.com

    Tevan said...

    in what ways does the insitu leeching contribute to lesser ground disturbance and how does the insitu leeching work?

    Tevan Nair
    ME3630
    dr.spiceinlife@yahoo.com

    Tevan said...

    in what ways does the insitu leeching contribute to lesser ground disturbance and how does the insitu leeching work?

    Tevan Nair
    ME3630
    dr.spiceinlife@yahoo.com

    Unknown said...

    good information...whether this way does not make any impact on the environment especially human? And how much electricity can be generated from this process?

    Anisa Syahira Che Azmi
    CE083422
    brown_stubby@yahoo.com

    Unknown said...

    as stated there is 3 different types of mining process. and insitu leaching is preferred because its advantages. wat about the quality of it?

    GULSHANJIT SINGH
    (ME083709)
    shanjitscsa@yahoo.com

    Unknown said...

    i would like to add to darshan's question,that is in the event of the reactor heating up,how is maintenance carried out without allowing the leak of radioactivity?

    Anonymous said...

    yes i agree in situ leaching mining. it is also used in for mining copper ,gold , and also slouble salts...the benefits are reliable than the others.how about the nuclear waste products.will it never harm the plants?

    komagen s/o elamaran
    me083564
    komag5247@yahoo.com

    Siong Lim said...

    In-situ is definitely the best way of mining uranium. Especially mining uranium because it puts the risk of workers being buried alive to zero, workers receiving radiation exposure to only once and air pollution is also zero. But the mining process can only be used when the uranium is situated far away from a native underground water source and is soluble so the pipes can carry the "pregnant" solution to be processed.

    Anonymous said...

    in this method, how much will it affect the surroundings, will the water be able to be restored to its safe condition after all the adding of chemicals?

    Justin Peter Joseph
    (me083557)
    terbalik_just23@hotmail.com

    senna said...

    hi,
    i would like to know about the safety precautions that is actually applied to the mining workers? can you describe about it?
    thanks,

    utrasenan_87@yahoo.com
    utrasenan a/l gunasegaran
    me083416

    Anonymous said...

    if in situ leaching is good enough,why there are also two other process???
    what is the disadvantages of in situ leaching??
    Amirul Hafez Bin Darobi
    me084047
    apeh90@yahoo.com

    ravnav11 said...

    can a nuclear plant blow up like a bomb?are there any chances of this happening...

    ravindran a/l navalan
    me083947

    Unknown said...

    Yes i totally support the government's initiative to introduce nuclear energy in our country.
    As long as, all the important aspects are taken account...be it the safety standards, management protocols, and waste management. It shouldn't be a problem...:D

    (Nothing else to think of)
    Ikram bin Mohd Hariffin
    Me083550
    ikramax@gmail.com

    Unknown said...

    "All mankind is now learning that these nuclear weapons can only serve to destroy, never become beneficial."

    Alva Myrdal
    :)

    Kamariah bt Kamaruddin
    ME082753
    kasyahkhairuddin@yahoo.com

    Anonymous said...

    there are many factors which determines the method of mining the power source. the uranium used does not all go to waste. most of it is used again after some processes to enrich them. but the disposal part is where i feel ther is a great margin for many mishaps to happen. however, the authorities can overcome them by putting in place strict protocols and systems for tracking the waste materials to prevent abuse


    joel bharath
    me083556
    sect6

    Unknown said...

    all this is really informative but as i said earlier do we really need to go through all of this right now when we have ample of power.and if they carry on with this project,will the funding be done by private investors or at the expense of the rakyat.my personal oppinion is with malaysia blessed weather and resourses,we should make full use of it.i have nothing agains nuclear power.i think its brilliant but my prob is that we dont really need to yet.I rather the goverment use the money to concentrate on there persuit to increase our anual gdp by 7% in order to archieve wawasan 2020 by 2020 and not later.

    Harsukhvir singh godrei
    me083547
    sukh_x@hotmail.com

    najiah hashim said...

    HI. It is such a very good and informative article.I just know that nuclear fuel cycle consists of the stages which are Front end fuel management,In core fuel management and Back end fuel management. Nuclear fuel cycle or nuclear chain cycle is a process to generate electricity.

    NURUL NAJIAH BINTI HASHIM
    ME083972
    nurul.najiah@yahoo.com

    Karen Knoll said...

    In-situ is definitely the best way of mining uranium. Especially mining uranium because it puts the risk of workers being buried alive to zero, workers receiving radiation exposure to only once and air pollution is also zero. But the mining process can only be used when the uranium is situated far away from a native underground water source and is soluble so the pipes can carry the "pregnant" solution to be processed.

    Related Posts with Thumbnails